Don't Fall for This Clean Energy Scam

Having trouble viewing this issue? Click here. Refer a Friend to Energy and Capital.

Don't Fall for This Clean Energy Scam By Jeff Siegel | Monday, July 18th, 2011 No one should be surprised by this one. Last week, we got word that American Electric Power (NYSE: AEP) would be putting a hold on its plans to commercialize a new carbon capture and storage (CCS) project. According to CEO Michael Morris, the lack of federal greenhouse gas reduction requirements is to blame: The commercialization of this technology is vital if owners of coal-fueled generation are to comply with potential future climate regulations without prematurely retiring efficient, cost-effective generating capacity. But as a regulated utility, it is impossible to gain regulatory approval to recover our share of the costs for validating and deploying the technology without federal requirements to reduce greenhouse gas emissions already in place. While I don't disagree with Morris, I maintain that the biggest problem with getting CCS off the ground is not a regulatory one... Advertisement It's Cheaper than Coal... Cleaner than Natural Gas... and More Powerful than Nuclear! It can provide 130,000 times our annual electricity consumption — and the U.S. Government is bankrolling the whole thing! Now, meet the one company that's about to introduce it to the world. Click here to learn more.  A $2 Billion Money Pit The truth is coal-fired power generation only has one advantage: it's insanely cheap. And quite frankly, it's only cheap because we refuse to account for externalities — and we allow lawmakers to pony up some very generous tax payer support to keep the industry humming along. But hey, I'm not here to regurgitate uncomfortable realities. Bottom line is the market could care less about this stuff; all the market really knows (or cares about) is this: No form of power generation provides us with more electricity than coal. As long as it remains cheaper than nuclear, solar and wind, this is not something that will change anytime soon. And it's for this very reason you'll never see any real commercial-scale “clean coal” technology take root. You see, it wasn't long ago when the government's centerpiece for its “clean coal” strategy, FutureGen, was shelved due to the prohibitive cost of implementing this technology... FutureGen was intended to be a near zero-emissions coal-fired power plant that used CCS. It never got off the ground because the costs for the planned 275 MW coal-fired power plant had ballooned to nearly $2 billion — and that was just to build it. That price tag didn't include the cost of the actual coal, shipping, or operational costs. No matter how you looked at it, the thing was a loser from day one. But that's how it goes with “clean coal” technology; it's insanely expensive, and it actually serves to deplete our remaining coal reserves at a much faster rate. The Incredible Shrinking Coal Bounty As my colleague Ian Cooper showed you in a previous post, we may actually be at peak coal production this year. While most still believe we have a whopping 250-year supply, the most recent USGS data tells us that we actually have fewer than 100 years remaining (based on current rates of consumption and not accounting for increased exports). In other words, our massive coal supply is shrinking by the day. And with the implementation of CCS technology, we actually expedite the depletion of our coal bounty. You see, the carbon capture and sequestration process is actually a bit of an energy hog. It consumes a portion of the energy that's actually produced at a coal-fired power plant. Peak energy expert Richard Heinberg has suggested that if carbon capture and sequestration is implemented, it will increase the amount of coal required in order to produce the same amount of energy we rely on today. Heinberg estimates the “energy penalty” for this technology could be as high as 40 percent. This is not a winning proposition for coal-fired power plant operators or consumers. Advertisement Wait Just Two Weeks... and You Could Miss Out on the End of Oil Things move fast in the world of energy... and that includes the profits. The biggest paydays only come to those who put their chips in at the exact right moment — and that's why I'm writing to you today. As the world scrambles for energy solutions, this small cap company is about to deliver in a big way. There's too much to describe in this space, so if you'd like to hear about this opportunity before the masses, check out this broadcast.  An Uninsurable Risk And here's one more issue that few — especially CCS advocates — are willing to discuss: Who the hell wants to insure these things? As the CEO of Kinder Morgan Energy Partners wrote a couple of years ago: Clean coal is a bunch of hooey until legal liability gets sorted out. When it comes to burying CO2 from coal-fired power plants, Kinder Morgan is not willing to sign up for guaranteeing to the U.S. government or to whomever that it will forever stay in the ground in this salt dome in Louisiana — and it doesn't — just come back and see ole Kinder Morgan and we'll make you good for it. I guess sometimes you just have to refer to a Texas energy exec to get some straight talk. Bottom line: Clean coal is a myth, a lie, and a joke with a very bad punch line. The whole damned thing is a scam. If implemented, it will cost consumers a fortune. That's why it'll never see the light of day, no matter how many coal state senators shake down tax payers to make it happen. If you're like me and enjoy making a ton of dough in clean energy, stick to actual clean energy. Don't waste your time with “clean coal.” You'll just end up getting burned in the end. And if you really want to make money in coal, let the suckers chase these CCS pipe dreams while you focus your attention on where the real coal action is — most of which is actually outside U.S. borders... Just ask Chris DeHaemer, who's not only been making a killing in Mongolian oil — he's also been cleaning up on Mongolian coal. One of his Mongolian coal plays is up 347% already. Good luck ever seeing that kind of action with “clean coal”! To a new way of life, and a new generation of wealth... Jeff Siegel Editor, Energy and Capital Related Articles Peak Coal Theory Mongolia Hates Good News Clean Coal Myth From the Archives... Southern Union Up in the Air; Petrohawk Grabbed by BHP 2011-07-15 - Brianna Panzica For Sale: Flying Car 2011-07-15 - Nick Hodge Russia's Mad Dash to Growth 2011-07-14 - Christian A. DeHaemer Solar Panels, Electric Car Batteries, and More 2011-07-14 - Brianna Panzica Refinery and Production Arms Separate 2011-07-14 - Brianna Panzica Economic Releases for the week of Monday, July 18th, 2011: Jul 18 - NAHB Housing Market Index Jul 20 - MBA Mortgage Index Jul 20 - Existing Home Sales Jul 21 - Philadelphia Fed Jul 19 - Building Permits Jul 19 - Housing Starts Jul 21 - Leading Indicators Brought to you by Wealth Daily

You can manage your subscription and get our privacy policy here. Energy and Capital, Copyright © 2011, Angel Publishing LLC, P.O. Box 84905, Phoenix, AZ 85071. All rights reserved. No statement or expression of opinion, or any other matter herein, directly or indirectly, is an offer or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell the securities or financial instruments mentioned. While we believe the sources of information to be reliable, we in no way represent or guarantee the accuracy of the statements made herein. Energy and Capital does not provide individual investment counseling, act as an investment advisor, or individually advocate the purchase or sale of any security or investment. The publisher, editors and consultants of Angel Publishing may actively trade in the investments discussed in this newsletter. They may have substantial positions in the securities recommended and may increase or decrease such positions without notice. Neither the publisher nor the editors are registered investment advisors. Subscribers should not view this publication as offering personalized legal or investment counseling. Investments recommended in this publication should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company in question. Unauthorized reproduction of this newsletter or its contents by Xerography, facsimile, or any other means is illegal and punishable by law. Please note: It is not our intention to send email to anyone who doesn't want it. If you're not sure why you're getting this e-letter, or no longer wish to receive it, get more info here, including our privacy policy and information on how to manage your subscription.