Watch Them Die

Having trouble viewing this issue? Click here. Refer a Friend to Energy and Capital.

Watch Them Die By Keith Kohl | Wednesday, June 29th, 2011 Unfortunately, U.S. sentiment toward domestic oil production is a case of foggy optimism. Look at the facts: U.S. production peaked at just slightly over 10 million barrels per day in November 1970. Domestic production that year averaged approximately 9.6 million barrels per day. That's it. There's no getting around it. To think we'll ever return to our glory days is nonsense. It won't happen. Yet despite this decline, we still see rampant optimism. Let's take a moment today to really examine this kind of wishful thinking...   Advertisement House of Saud: Burglarized They're the wealthiest family in the world, with a net worth as high as $1 trillion... But even they're not immune to theft. Find out how an ancient geological artifact has just located up to $267 billion worth of vanished Saudi oil.   In March, U.S. crude oil production was about 5.6 million barrels per day. That's a 2.3% increase over the same period in 2010. Let's put this recent production increase into perspective: See that tiny up-tick at the tail end of the chart? That's the best news we've had in four decades, and it's merely a dent in the big picture. Meanwhile, consumption is once again north of 19 million barrels per day. Now, we're not trying to detract from the good news. The rise in unconventional production over the last few years is the reason there's any optimism at all. But unfortunately, it's also giving us a false sense of security — a muddled cushion that allows us to continue believing all is well with our oil supply. All is not well. And things get even worse when you look at the bigger decline picture. The Fall of the Super Giants Erase any doubt you might have regarding the importance giant oil fields play in global production. To be considered a "giant", the field is believed to have 500 million barrels of ultimately recoverable oil or gas equivalent. Only a handful of those fields — the top 20, in fact — account for roughly 25% of global oil production. Also consider that nearly all of these fields have passed their peak and are now in decline, with an annual decline rate of approximately 6.7%. In certain OPEC members, the loss of production from these giant oil fields could be catastrophic. More than 90% of Saudi Arabia's production comes from just 6-7 fields. The largest of the bunch is Ghawar, at which Saudi Aramco is forced to inject ever-increasing amounts of seawater just to keep the field's production on life-support. This problem isn't unique to the Saudis. The same can be said of the top oil-producing countries in the world. In Iraq and Kuwait, nearly all of production stems from just a handful of giant oil fields. So we can't help but wonder how long the charade will last. After all, the world's giant oil fields have been in production for at least 40 or more years. You might be saying to yourself, "Not a problem — we'll just go out and find more of these blockbuster oil fields and the problem is solved, isn't it?" That's not exactly the case. The giant oil discoveries of today aren't just harder to find; they're also much more expensive to produce.   Advertisement The U.S. Government just pumped $100 million into one geothermal company. Which one is it? It's the one developing a new technology that can provide 130,000 times our annual electricity consumption! But don't take our word for it... These numbers come directly from M.I.T. researchers. You can read all the details here.    Shifting Production So here's the rub: Giant oil fields are becoming scarce. Even though these fields provide about 60% of global crude production, we're simply not finding any more of them. Furthermore, the ones we do manage to find aren't the same as the Ghawars and Burgans, relics of better oil discovery days. Allow me to give you an example: the highly-touted Tupi oil field. When it was announced, the U.S. was busy licking its chops in anticipation, and Brazil couldn't wait to fill its coffers. Located in the Santos Basin off the coast of Rio De Janeiro, the 5-8 billion barrels of recoverable oil were as good as it gets in today's Peak Oil climate. We're constantly told the Tupi field is the largest oil discovery on this side of the world in the last three decades. But what we also have to realize is that some of this oil is buried beneath almost 7,000 feet of water — then an additional 16,000 feet of rock and salt. Soon, the super giant fields that we depend on will come to follow the Cantarell path... Cantarell was once one of the three largest oil-producing fields in the world. Following its peak production in 2000 at 2.1 million barrels per day and subsequent steep decline, the field isn't even the largest in Mexico, having taken a backseat to the Ku-Maloob-Zaap complex. Peak Oil Investments The good news is in all of this is we have a road map to show us where production is headed. Roughly half of global oil production comes from about 4,000 smaller fields. During the next few decades, that gap will continue to widen — especially once the giants start failing us. And there's already a fight for that future supply... In Canada, a war is brewing over who will receive crude oil from Alberta's oil sands resource. While the United States continues to fight over the proposed Keystone XL pipeline (a decision on the pipeline is expected later this year), which will ship up to 900,000 barrels of oil sands production to U.S. refineries, the Canadian oil sands is becoming more attractive to Asian markets. In 2010, oil sands deals from Asia tripled — mostly from China, Japan, Thailand, and South Korea. In total, nearly $10 billion was spent last year by Asian energy companies, an 85% increase over 2009. Some of the investment opportunities in the oil sands are simply too good to overlook. One company's production alone is projected to exceed the current output of North Dakota. And here's a spoiler: Their success won't come from the trucks and shovels we're used to seeing... Instead, we're coming up on a fundamental shift to in-situ production, a method that will allow Canadian producers to reach up to 80% of the bitumen too deep to be mined. Until next time, Keith Kohl Editor, Energy and Capital Related Articles But We Don't Have Another 9.48 Million Barrels... Weekend: Is an Oil Supply Crunch Ahead? Stealing OPEC Profits Natural Gas Stocks Vs. Coal Stocks From the Archives... GE Joint Venture Invests in Water Treatment 2011-06-28 - Brianna Panzica A Liquid Investment Overview 2011-06-28 - Nick Hodge Chinese Companies Have Plans to Increase Share Value 2011-06-27 - Brianna Panzica A $286 Billion Play on Japan's Nuclear Fallout 2011-06-27 - Jeff Siegel Seven Billion by July 2011-06-25 - Nick Hodge Economic Releases for the week of Monday, June 27th, 2011: Jun 27 - Personal Income and Spending Jun 28 - Case-Shiller 20-city Index Jun 29 - Pending Home Sales Jun 30 - Chicago PMI Jul 01 - Construction Spending Jul 02 - Auto and Truck Sales Jun 28 - Consumer Confidence Jul 01 - Nonfarm Private Payrolls Jul 01 - Michigan Sentiment Jul 01 - ISM Index Jun 29 - MBA Mortgage Index Brought to you by Wealth Daily

You can manage your subscription and get our privacy policy here. Energy and Capital, Copyright © 2011, Angel Publishing LLC, P.O. Box 84905, Phoenix, AZ 85071. All rights reserved. No statement or expression of opinion, or any other matter herein, directly or indirectly, is an offer or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell the securities or financial instruments mentioned. While we believe the sources of information to be reliable, we in no way represent or guarantee the accuracy of the statements made herein. Energy and Capital does not provide individual investment counseling, act as an investment advisor, or individually advocate the purchase or sale of any security or investment. The publisher, editors and consultants of Angel Publishing may actively trade in the investments discussed in this newsletter. They may have substantial positions in the securities recommended and may increase or decrease such positions without notice. Neither the publisher nor the editors are registered investment advisors. Subscribers should not view this publication as offering personalized legal or investment counseling. Investments recommended in this publication should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company in question. Unauthorized reproduction of this newsletter or its contents by Xerography, facsimile, or any other means is illegal and punishable by law. Please note: It is not our intention to send email to anyone who doesn't want it. If you're not sure why you're getting this e-letter, or no longer wish to receive it, get more info here, including our privacy policy and information on how to manage your subscription.